CLOUD – don’t let technobabble cloud your judgement

CLOUD – don’t let technobabble cloud your judgement

As a new year dawns, it’s time to resolve to face up to so-called new IT trends and recognise that they are often merely marketing terms repackaged for the new generation and are far from new. They are merely re-inventions or groupings of services with a new name. At the end of May in a public meeting in Boston, Vineet Nayar, CEO at HCL Technologies declared that the “Cloud is Bullsh*t”, and I for one agree with him.

Vineet went on “My view on Cloud is that I always look for disruptive technologies that redefine the way the business gets run. If there is a disruptive technology out there that redefines business I am for it. If there is no underlying technology there, and it is just repackaging of a commercial solution, then I do not call it a business trend. I call it hype.”

The key question to ask is, is there a key underlying technology or not? There is not. There are many forms of virtualization, establishing shared services, “everything on demand” claims and being more effective and leaving spare capacity to be sold on to others. Weren’t bureaux set up in the 70’s and 80’s to achieve the same things; wasn’t workload partitioning on hard drives and partial software licensing to achieve lower cost and flexibility to clients? What is so different for “pay as you go” clients? Previous attempts, such as “IBM on Demand”, were the same service but it never really lifted off.

Early adopters do sometimes pay the price to get a better ROI and to use Enterprise shared service that they would not get otherwise. What shared services would those be then? Can you name any?

How is it that the biggest service providers in the world cannot provide a single simple agreed definition of what “cloud” is? Can we really look forward to consumption based IT services for measured, sophisticated and complex organisations?

Can we really look forward to benefits such as:

  1. 1) Cost containment – We need to develop Total Cost of Ownership models to understand to see whether Cloud can offer enterprise sustainable savings over time
  2. 2) Business knowledge and corporate memory – hard to retain as part of a true cloud offering. No transfer of assets, includes personnel. Bring back in-house – have would that work?
  3. 3) Immediacy – Act today and have the system working inside of a week.
  4. 4) Scalability – Allowing for real success (huge increases in capacity) and failure (no need to honour capacity expectations) and without expending undue sums to keep the capacity sitting around. Is this practical for suppliers who must invest upfront without guarantees of returns?
  5. 5) Resiliency – mirrored solutions for disaster scenarios and load-balancing traffic
  6. 6) Availability – bandwidth in all senses. Without it, service delays could be disastrous as there is little backup once our workload has been virtualised

Risks and concerns are well documented in terms of Security, trust in the longevity of the supplier, dynamic accountability of where the data actually is, compromises in confidentiality, disaster recovery of data spread all over the planet, etc.

The biggest risks come from legislation not further legislation but existing legislation, for example, the Patriot Act that extends to every US company to report any and all transactions than breach the ‘norm’ – norm not very well defined but large transactions, high value transactions, transactions undertaken in countries not considered “suitable” by the US authorities. EMC, IBM, HP, CSC, Cisco et al could be part of the cloud and therefore they are obliged to report and to not restrict US authorities in their duties – with no obligations to their client to report Patriot Act activities. Still happy?

Private Cloud Public Cloud – does the Patriot Act apply to Private Cloud? Yes if it is run by US based service companies.

So back to the main point – is there a fundamental underlying technology that I can get anything unique from the cloud that I cannot from other outsourced services or old fashioned hardware / software ownership? No

The only two questions you now need to ask now are a) is the lower cost versus security and other concerns worth it, and b) the question few think about, once totally committed and virtual, can we ever bring these services back under our direct control?

Posted in Technology Comments: 5 comments


5 Responses to CLOUD – don’t let technobabble cloud your judgement

  1. Joost Schlatmann says:

    Appreciated the Viewpoint in case. Very much liked the simplicity of words chosen and could not agree more its conclusion.

    Let’s hope cxo’s will a) ask their management the two mentioned key questions and b) are able to diggest, evaluate and discuss the answers provided. If so..fine. If not well…let’s hope for them the impact of yet another IT project not delivering on its promises is not going to be too known in the public domain.

  2. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joost Schlatmann, Joost Schlatmann. Joost Schlatmann said: CLOUD: dont let technobabble cloud your judgement […]

  3. CcAQapaA says:

    I really got into this article. I found it to be interesting and loaded with unique points of interest. I like to read material that makes me think. Thank you for writing this great content.

  4. 569056 736749very nice post, i definitely enjoy this fabulous website, persist with it 590271

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.